Originally Posted by Cyst
Ya after he copies the build I suggested than claims it as his own removing his orginal ****ty build but keeping his ****ty mej...
STILL BAD BUILD HAS MEJ
RoA + Tear
I'm telling you, you either misread my guide or are confusing mine with someone else's. I could stand your lack of dignity to formulate posts with any sense which permits proper comprehension, but I will not tolerate blind accusations of plagiarism.
If you're talking about our skill builds being the same, I invite you to see Lord Oliveira's post here
, stating our guides' builds to having been identical, which clearly indicates that the build has remained the same since its creation.
If you're talking about our item builds, then I justify that the shifting of my build to the option of obtaining Tear of the Goddess first, similar to your own, has existed as an alternate path in mine clearly stated under the former main build, visible in this post
, referring to the alternate build (before the time of your first posting in my guide's thread, I might add). Such as change was due to a change in my personal preference, as depicted here
, to an option which I had been perfectly familiar with, as evident through its previous inclusion as an alternate configuration.
If however you contend my accused fraud to be of the other two parts of your nondescript composition
RoA and Rylai's, then you surely must have misread our are joking, as RoA is not found anywhere in my enchiridion, and Rylai's, which, unfortunately, I have no proof (which exists in the post's history logs, if you're so passionate of the subject) of having been one of the situational items obtained last in my build prior to your posting, is such a common end-game item for casters that even stating its inclusion as plagiarism is laughable.
As for your statement of Mejai's being a bad item, I point you to this post
in which I allege its viability, and challenge you to formulate a coherent response explaining how I am wrong with backable proof, rather than with your usual usage of juvenile vulgarity.
Cyst, with all due respect if your understanding of the matter in consideration is at all hindered by any fault, whether it be a misinterpretation of what you believed such to be or a lack of adequate comprehension of the English language, then please take your time to correct such faults rather than simply blurting these discordant, insolent, and sometimes hateful responses to the rest of our wonderful community. If you will not, then I simply cannot be bothered to pay heed any longer to your immature retorts.
And so I bid thee a fine day, good sir.