The problem is getting the ratio for the elo per K/A ratio correct. That is not very easy. but good concept and i will see what i can do.

Good idea, i will change the system a little to accommodate. Thank you for the feed back

False, it has a cap. If you keep farming past the cap, what is the point except wasting time to be a jerk? Also minions will push to win either way.

I have since rethought the issue and do not agree. The Elo system was made by a man much smarter than you decades ago. It has been working flawlessly since then. The problem ppl have is they are selfish. The Elo system is made for chess a 1v1 game. The system sees teams as one entity. It is implemented for team que not solo. So when a team fails you fail. You are part of a team if you don't see it that way stop playing solo queues. The Elo system is good and needs no changing. Get a team and use that as your true elo. Or dont complain and think in team concepts not individual.

People try to improve upon a system so much, but the simplicity of the system is what makes it work. The more complex something is, the more room for errors or imbalance. Gaining Elo from your performance seems good when you think about, but there are numerous things that could happen that make a player get something they do not deserve, good or bad. For Example, a system revolving around getting Elo for kills, CS, and less deaths makes everyone play selfishly. Why the heck would I sacrifice myself for you so you can get a double? I get more Elo if I let you die and take the kills myself. The system works now because it doesn't matter your personal performance in game, but your teams. The system is meant for 1v1 chess, so symbolically your team should be 1, united. If you lose, you lose together, if you win, you win together. The game is a 1v1 match, if you will. (non-symbollically, basically your team is 1 entity, because 1v1 chess has 2 sides, the Elo system is only 2 sided.)

Well I disagree, which is why this post is here. While yes a loss is a loss and you are partially to blame for the loss. There is only so much you can do when bad players, afkers, and trolls populate 3/5 on your team. Example i went 14-8-12 on katarina, The ezreal on our team went 17-10-9 out of 34 kills he and i had 31. So when that happens, i feel we were doing everything we can. BUT WE STILL LOST. Do you think we should suffer when we literally could not carry Jax, graves, and taric. If you do, please tell me why i had to fight 5 competent enemies and only had 1 competent ally... Honestly a team game requires 5 v 5 intelligent people on both sides. When it is 5v2.75.... not so much a team game. It is a SLAUGHTER. i feel that Ezreal and I should not have suffered because players don't understand how to play. Also when it comes to que, you can only have 2 players not a team entity que. This means that i chose the people i am playing with, fully aware of their abilities and skills. this NOT BEING THE CASE i would wonder why the team should be counted as a whole? This system is meant for solo que, not 5v5 match making or 3v3 match making. Oh and thanks for calling me stupid to start off your post.

If you let them die, you may not get the kills. While i agree though, A complex system makes it harder and easier to abuse, it also will root out the bad more quickly. Also why does everyone relate it to chess? I don't play chess with 5 people thinking as 1 and play against 5 people. That is a terrible representation. I would rather compare it to 5 INDIVIDUALS playing a video games with 5 other INDIVIDUALS. Please don't even bring in CS to this either. I DIDNT INCLUDE CS FOR A REASON. if you didn't read the system DONT COMMENT.......

I didn't like the frag's reward part... Frag doesn't mean what you have done in game (except the trolls 0/8). But your new ELO system it's much better than actual.

tier 7 is retarded, You're punishing people for wanting to play a new game, after the won they are in is lost.

I went (50 minute long game) into a losing game as ahri, declined every surrender vote, TURNED IT AROUND AT 40 AND WON. So yea i think if you are just gunna give up losing 1 Elo is not that big of a price.