Quote:
Originally Posted by Fersaken
Greetings Summoners,
I come to these forums a good bit, but rarely ever post, primarily because these forums remind me of World of Warcraft.
|
Lol true it can get like that sometimes. I find it depends primarily on how you address the people you are talking too. If you stay curt and polite people will often respond in kind.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fersaken
But after reading and participating in the tribunal cases on several different occasions I have to say I think it is the most flawed justice system I have ever seen in my life.
|
You are welcome to believe this but Riot staff insists that it is highly accurate. At what point would it benefit them to keep a system that is flawed when a majority of their income is based of active population and not micro-transaction?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fersaken
The Tribunnal is not about whats right or wrong as a society, but what whats right or wrong in a single individuals eyes. What I mean by that is some people justify killing other people by whatever means they see fit. That makes it right in their eyes. Though the tribunnal is set up to be ran like a jury, it isn't. Even in court the prosecutor, and defender are allowed to pick / eliminate jurors. This is much more fair.
|
Tribunal is not about what is right or wrong as seen by the society, because societal norms vary based on person to person thus why it is based on a generalized set of norms "The summoners code." Player tier tribunal is based off the validation of the an automated system that flags player with a high ratio of games played to games reported. What player tier does is effectively say Yes this player needs to be punished by riot, or no this player doesn't need to be punished. Tribunal(at the players tier) is not like the US court system in any way other because guilt or innocence is not determined by the players tier.
I'm going to stop there with the breakdown reposts, because the above addresses most of your continued "rant." Though i will point out some key points, At no point is someone subject to a 15 person review the minimum is 20 but Riot set that in the cases of low Tribunal access. the average case has hundreds of people judging as well as a riot staffer once the case moves past the player tier.
@OP Though you have been participating in Tribunal you fail to understand some key facts about it. Some people on this forum have been following the Tribunal and how it works since it was created. participation by no means shows understanding.
Tribunal is a multi-tier judgement system that starts off by an automated system generating a case file of a flagged player that has a high games played to games reported ratio. This case file is a collection of the players most resent games and is sent to a random selection of active tribunal participants at which point it is "judged/ validated" and is punished if low level (IE warning) or proceeds to a Riot staff member. The riot staff then does background on said player and decides punishment.