North America - English
Support

League of Legends Community

League of Legends Community > Competitive Play > Competitive Discussion
100% Fix for Ranked Games.

  • Page 2 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
ÐâGGêR ?? Member
This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information This user has accepted the summoners code, click for more information
10-26-2012

the simple fact is, regardless of anything else, a person should be qued with people who it is thier first game in ranked,which 90% they will be banning cluelessly

+0
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
ÐâGGêR ?? Member
This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information This user has accepted the summoners code, click for more information
11-03-2012

Wish a Red would see/post on this topic.

+0
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
Mestaaja ?? Senior Member
This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information This user has accepted the summoners code, click for more information
11-04-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by xXGyroBoxXx View Post
I think you should work on your own gameplay before talking doo-doo about the new players that come in. If you're as "experienced" as you think you are then you should be able to perform a lot better and carry the team at 1300 elo. Sorry if this offends you but I'll be honest, 1300 is a joke and being there after 600 ranked wins doesn't exactly mean you're that experienced. I personally think that you are just slightly crying about having some completely random new player on your team and not some super pro smurf 1000-0 player.
Either way, it skews the game and makes it not fun or fair for either team. Even if you would be "stuck" in 1300 elo (which btw is far better than the majority of players), experience would give you an advantage over the freshman who just started ranked and should not be matched with people that have over 500 wins.
You who argue against this proposition, please list the disadvantages instead of bashing the OP's elo etc.

+0
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
SixxTwinWounds ?? Member
11-04-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unholymend View Post
With 600 ranked wins you should be a lot higher elo. I think you need to focus on improving your own gameplay before criticizing your team. Doing a quick look at your stats, you have 7 deaths a game, which is INCREDIBLY high. Also your CS is quite low. 57 in a 25 min game, 168 in 55 mins, 159 in 55 mins. You're doing something wrong
Team based game play includes teamwork. 7 deaths in a game isn't a lot XD Especially in longer games. Also depending on what role he is playing how well his team is communicating. What defensive people call communicating is criticizing. However people don't understand that when you try to give advice that you want to win just as bad as they do. That being said, if you only plan on being insulting to player on a forum then why respond? Don't you have better things to do?

+0
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
SixxTwinWounds ?? Member
11-04-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by pG Outrageous View Post
Over 600 ranked wins.
Playing at 1300.

The problem is that you are not very good at this video game, and despite playing for a long time you are actually no better than new players.

That's the reality of the situation. You can get mad at the world and stay low Elo or you can get better, doesn't really matter to us what you choose.
People like this deserve bans

+1
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
SixxTwinWounds ?? Member
11-04-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Selcopa View Post
And someone of a higher elo will say the exact same thing about me.

The difference is we are not trying suggest that we belong at higher elo. or that its broken.
Elo is created for 1v1 chess not 5v5 online game play where there are a slew of variables to determine the outcome of a game beyond perceived skill level. Though people like you always assume that people with bad luck have no skill.

+1
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
ÐâGGêR ?? Member
This user has referred a friend to League of Legends, click for more information This user has accepted the summoners code, click for more information
12-29-2012

Let's go RIOT, lets this in the works.

+0
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
RabbidRabbi ?? Junior Member
This user has accepted the summoners code, click for more information
12-30-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by SixxTwinWounds View Post
Elo is created for 1v1 chess not 5v5 online game play where there are a slew of variables to determine the outcome of a game beyond perceived skill level. Though people like you always assume that people with bad luck have no skill.
This says it all.

+0
 
Comment below rating threshold, click here to show it.
Pátrîck ?? Junior Member
This user has accepted the summoners code, click for more information
12-30-2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unholymend View Post
With 600 ranked wins you should be a lot higher elo. I think you need to focus on improving your own gameplay before criticizing your team. Doing a quick look at your stats, you have 7 deaths a game, which is INCREDIBLY high. Also your CS is quite low. 57 in a 25 min game, 168 in 55 mins, 159 in 55 mins. You're doing something wrong
You do realize that cs averages go down when your you win/lose faster right?

+0
  • Page 2 of 2
  • 1
  • 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »