Originally Posted by Kooshboo
Cases get assigned to random people, some are more lenient than others and at times a toxic player just lucks up and gets a lenient jury or a jury that does not review all the cases and just makes a snap call off the first case they view (which also is randomized from juror to juror). Riot's typical response to this is to not worry, if they are truly toxic they will come up on report again and will not always be so lucky.
You need to realize that "toxic" is subjective. You wish all the players who voted pardon were careless while those who agree with you must not have been, right? You cannot objectively say a player should be banned based on the tribunal. A lot of you think your own personal opinions about other players are how it must be. He was voted not "toxic," and as far as the tribunal goes, he was therefore NOT toxic. gg wp.