Originally Posted by A Rye Bread God

I long for the days of the heal-poke meta, compared to this tanky-dps meta, that was heaven.



Heal sustain is fine in my opinion, I've read your explainations on it before, and it's always just your personal opinion of how you don't like healing. Never any actual negative impact it has on game play.

Are you telling me that if you buffed Soraka's Q and gave her a passive that was actually worth-a-**** she would some how be OP because she can heal too?

@Shurelia, REALLY disappointed in you with the buffs to Sona. Sort of lost any faith I had in you in regards to knowledge of support.

She needed BUFFS and BIG ONES, not rebalancing. You nerfed the base numbers on Q to buff the AP ratio, not what she needed. The passive change failed hard too.

Do you guys even play test this stuff? I feel like if you had actually play tested the changes to Sona with anyone who actually knows what they are doing you would know that this change was really mediocre.

I'll take what I can get in regards to buffs for Soraka and Sona, but man you really missed the mark. Was hoping for Sona to be close to Janna, but she's still S-Tier.

Originally Posted by Shurelia

What does she need then? Your post didn't really say anything.

Originally Posted by Shurelia

What does she need then? Your post didn't really say anything.

Originally Posted by A Rye Bread God

I long for the days of the heal-poke meta, compared to this tanky-dps meta, that was heaven.



Heal sustain is fine in my opinion, I've read your explainations on it before, and it's always just your personal opinion of how you don't like healing. Never any actual negative impact it has on game play.

Are you telling me that if you buffed Soraka's Q and gave her a passive that was actually worth-a-**** she would some how be OP because she can heal too?

@Shurelia, REALLY disappointed in you with the buffs to Sona. Sort of lost any faith I had in you in regards to knowledge of support.

She needed BUFFS and BIG ONES, not rebalancing. You nerfed the base numbers on Q to buff the AP ratio, not what she needed. The passive change failed hard too.

Do you guys even play test this stuff? I feel like if you had actually play tested the changes to Sona with anyone who actually knows what they are doing you would know that this change was really mediocre.

I'll take what I can get in regards to buffs for Soraka and Sona, but man you really missed the mark. Was hoping for Sona to be close to Janna, but she's still S-Tier.

Originally Posted by Tropico

Call me crazy, but from the tone of that post I'd say he isn't really looking for a dialogue...

Originally Posted by Akai Tsuki

Couple of things.

1) Solo queue isn't the only queue there is. Teams designed to abuse sieging towers for the whole time ARE a problem, and balancing has to be done for ranked premade/tournament play first while not having any degenerative elements for lower ratings or solo queue.
2) /facepalm. I already explained why that doesn't work in draft environment (the main focus of top level play).
3) How can you push or do dragon/baron when they will eat your turret at the time you go for another objective? You also cannot defend 4v5 else the tower will be eaten before you accomplish anything at all.

Sorry but it seems you never played against such a team yourself.

Originally Posted by A Rye Bread God

Are you telling me that if you buffed Soraka's Q and gave her a passive that was actually worth-a-**** she would some how be OP because she can heal too?
.

Originally Posted by A Rye Bread God

I do too, and I have yet to see them mention how this has a negative impact on the game in any way.

Originally Posted by Shurelia

What does she need then? Your post didn't really say anything.