At this point I must recommend you find a new pair of eyes, as yours appear to have ceased functioning. You may want to consult a physician.

why would I give you money? can't you just divorce some guy for that? (getting pregnant also works too, as you can just poke holes in the condom and the man will still be forced to pay you child support, but the negative being you now have a child to raise).

joking aside, I tire of the feminist crusades, whatever valid points you have are lost in a sea of banality, of hair splitting and gnashing of teeth.

I tire of them because now all I see is the "winner" flaunting victory over and over, we get it, you won, society bows to your discretion, rubbing it in our faces just how much you marionette society is just droll at this point.

I've seen what you do a million times now across hundreds of topics, there is no recourse, no counter arguement is allowed, no discussion, the fem"Brain Trust" has already decided everything, and is just eagerly awaiting conformity, so they can go onto the next marching ground of frivolous, ceaseless, pointless and just mean and invasive restructuring of everything.

Just because there are an infinite number of ways to hold a sword and dagger doesn't make her's unviable.
And lets assume its wrong. How is she oversexualized even then?
How do you draw a woman without drawing her body parts? :/

Because the main focus of her splash art is her ass and torso. Since you seem to be intentionally oblivious of this fact. Which leads me to thinking you're trolling. Are you trolling?

They're not part of my arsenal - because you're not talking about my counterargument.

My counter to your argument is that the creation of champions and all that pertains is up to the sole discretion of their creator. You can ask for champions with different body types - but, congratulations, hundreds of others already have. And you asking doesn't mean they should be made.

My other counterargument is that any woman who would actually take offense to the portrayal of women in videogames from a stance of gender equality is completely stupid and laughable.

Which you cant see thanks to her 'obnoxious' pose

BECAUSE THE BRAIN TRUST DEMANDS IT TO BE TRUE.

seeing a womens rear or front make it OVER-SEXUALIZED.

its a flawless, unbeatable arguement, if it weren't incredibly subjective and opinionated.

but you cannot DARE speak against the Feminist Brain Trust or your a sexist, misogynist Pig-man who hasn't checked his Male privilege.

DO GO ON, tell us how her ass being the "main focus" makes it overtly-sexulized.

BRIDGE THE GAP between your subjective insanity and objective logic.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-W_T9_4d9ld...e-painting.jpg

really? because I see the side of her ass. no cheeks or butt cleavage.they didn't even go for camel toe where it would have been obvious.

Read my edit please. Also, just because it's not the actual backside, does not mean you cannot see it. I heard a side view is difficult.