Xypherous, can you talk about Sheen?

Someone mentioned there's going to be a tank version of Sheen.

A lot of the champions that can use Sheen very effectively (Akali, Shen, Mordekaiser) don't want the mana. Are you going to remove the mana portion from sheen?

Cant wait to have this as a core item on Fiora.

With regard to the .05 second limiter. How does it work with Fiora's Ult? She bounces between multiply people, but I am unsure if it is more than that .05 sec limter between targets.

Can't completely ignore one and count the other.

And why do you even care about Tiamat balance for "AD Carry" anyway. Passive is melee only, so if you're buying it, you're doing it wrong. It's designed to be a MASSIVE buff to melee autoattackers who build AS/AD, i.e. the subset of champions that suck ******* even more than Assassins right now. Melee Carries.

Fiora's ult is .25 seconds between attacks. Well outside the timer. It's only instantaneous AoEs that will be affected, i.e. Shyvana and Twitch targets that are standing on top of eachother. At point blank and max range, you could still get multiple hits from Twitch ult bolts.

nice update

Because he was comparing Ionic Spark and Wit's End, and by extension, HP and Resists.

When you compare HP and Resists, Resists tend to win heavily as the game progresses.

Context, context, context. It's not an absolute "HP sucks". It's a "there's something better on a VERY similar item".

Just gonna point out, Spellvamp currently functions with any champion active ability except for those that apply on hit effects (with a couple strange exceptions... IE. fizz q) Summoner spells, and active item effects(ie gunblade's 300 damage). It has always functioned this way.

In other words, if it does damage and not considered an auto attack it procs spellvamp.

Ok, thanks for the info. I just wasn't sure about the time between attacks and that cleared it up.

That is not true. I was buying Spark exactly because it was giving health (and had nice effects too)

I see people have big misconception. Health is better if you have resistances. I mean. If you have just health, you can survive and tank some, but you will be killed fast. If you have just resistances you can survive heavy burst, but you fail to sustain damage. In order to really tank, tanks need to make both. Actually, in my opinion, reaching about 200 both, armor and magic resistance is maximum of actually useful resistances. Because if you focus and keep on making only resistances, enemy players will just make LW/VS and burst you because you have as much health as rest of your team.

Try to tank only with resistances and without making any health items. Soon enough you won't be able to tank at all.

Also, resistances have big weakness. Penetration. Magic and armor easily lower that effective health of armor/magic resistance, when health doesn't have that problem. Health is only lowered by damage, nothing else. So armor and magic resistance is helping in making health works better, but armor and magic resistance is weak without health to support them.

I'd kinda compare it to shield vs heal. While shield (resistances) give you temporary toughness, heal (health) give you constant toughness by restoring your health.

Not to seem mean, just trying to clarify:
> Surge is being removed because people are bad.
> Tiamat is being changed because people are bad.
> Promote is being added to an item that will harm customization (a change that's supposedly to produce customization), and probably have useless stats such as {+mana}, making it hard to buy on {manaless} Champions.

Is this correct?