I'm not saying that the thread should be deleted, locked, move, or anything. I'm not saying the thread shouldn't have been created in the first place.
Look, in the original post, he was asking for his case. He has been giving tips on how to find his case. He hasn't asked for any more advice on how to find his case, yet he's been making posts trying to defend his behavior and explain why he shouldn't be banned.
Not only have we not seen the card to tell him whether we agree with him or tell him he's wrong, even HE apparently hasn't seen his card. If even HE hasn't seen this card, then how can he be making these arguments?
Up to this point, the thread has served its purpose: to assist the original poster in finding out more information about his ban.
If, in the future, the original poster would like to have a discussion, that's fine. But that's a discussion that is impossible to have until the reform card has been posted in the thread. What I'm asking and the point I was making in the post you first quoted by me, is that we need to wait till we see a reform card to have that discussion.
Look at the posts he's making.
Originally Posted by TCD Froggen
I have been banned once i think for flaming and that was in my early days of playing, i really dont feel this perma ban is deserved and i dont feel its proving much to me as i follow the summoners code... its others who dont who spam "mid or afk" in lobby even though they are a lower pick, i pick mid, they flame and auto lock a mid champ and force me to go into another lane and i do bad and i get reported not them... i already have an alt account im using and its pretty stupid to just ban an account i was nice on... ive made alot of friends and have been helping them learn the game i really dont feel like im a bad person to the community....
He doesn't feel the ban is deserved-- well, how could he? He hasn't seen his card. And you, me, and anyone else who visits this thread can't even agree/disagree with him, we haven't seen his card either, and we likely haven't played any matches with him.
He claims the ban isn't proving much to him-- well, how can it? He hasn't seen his card, so it's impossible for him to understand what behavior earned him this ban.
He claims he follows the summoner's code--but does he? We don't know. There's no reform card to discuss.
He's accusing the behavior of other players as the cause of his ban--is this accurate? Again, we don't know. There is no reform card.
The original poster, before looking at the reform card himself or posting it in this thread, is trying to have a discussion that's impossible to have without a reform card. That's the point I'm making.