Originally Posted by KrremLotion
I'm asking what logic does the majority use to find this justified. You tell me that I'm antagonizing people by saying "baited" x1000 times when i said that once or twice and you dont even have any information about why i said it when i said it what happened. It makes no sense at all to find that offensive.
I get troll reported, troll banned and now trolled on forums that I shouldn't joke about baiting people... yeah crazy religious tribunal zealots
Lets really look at the case:
One of the THREE people that reported you in the match said
"would leave the team and not listen to anything we said, and fed mid a couple other people, and the only reason he got kills is because he ks'd"
There are multiple instances in the chat of your teamates asking you to stop going out alone, go b, come back, and stop what you're doing. You were obviously just running around and not listening. Punishable behavior.
The feeding is obvious because you have 16 deaths and all of your teamates have 2-4. The scores don't lie. The feeding accusation is proved. Punishable behavior.
In order to pad your score so the feeding isn't obvious (because you know you're about to be reported) you start ks'ing your teamates around 6 times. You can tell because each time you ks'd you said something offensive to the other team. 7 kills total. All adds up.
You ask people to read the case but the irony is the more of the chat I read the EASIER it is to see that you're a troll and the ban is justified. The top tribunal voters pay attention to these things which you think we don't see.