Also agreed. I'm not risking my main account posting on these forums, Riot bans accounts for bad reasons. A friend of mine got banned for the name "num lock guy" just because enough people reported him. I mean what? Another friend of mine was banned from the forums indefinitely after stupid reasons. But I am not here for them, I am here for this, and the fact is, the tribunal needs to be tweaked before it's used because so many people are being unfairly banned. "league of justice" riiiight.

Hi, this is my main account for 3 years now.

Also, OP here's my response to your thread. http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/....php?t=2986841

I do not think you understand what that word means.

Such an important case, you linked it twice?

Any reason to think they weren't?

So this one is just evidence that different people have different opinions.

In a range of 14,000 case, you showed 4 (or 5) as evidence. Accepting your judgment without any skepticism, you've shown a 0.03% error rate.

To use your Russian Roulette example, that's like playing with a 2888 chambered revolver and one round. Which doesn't kill you the first four times it shoots you.

This is actually happening. I myself have gotten the same game in two cases, with two different offenders.

Oh, of course, you have better evidence than you presented, you just don't want to show it.

1.) If you spam punish, you are part of the problem you want fixed. Start fixing it by stopping doing that.
2.) The overall punish rate has no bearing on the accuracy unless you know the actual guilty rate. An aside: Japan has a 99% criminal conviction rate. Why? Because prosecutors are so poorly funded they only bring a case to trial if they have overwhelming evidence. By waiting for so many reports before building a case, the Tribunal is doing something similar.

How the hell is getting in the Tribunal unavoidable if only 1.4% of players get in there?

98.6% of players avoid the tribunal.

Most of them don't play often enough to accumulate the number of reports acquired to be part of it, or they play with friends and avoid it altogether since most times friends won't report each other.

Even if all they did was play with friends, there's still 5 other people on the opposing team to report if they did anything that broke the summoner's code. 1 report counts the same as multiple reports in a single game, so all it takes is one ticked off opponent for it to count. But if they're not being jerks at all, then there's no reason to report.

Sure, I'll concede that some of that percentage may be newer accounts that don't have enough games, but some people have come on here saying they're not even past level 10 and have been warned/banned. Personally, I think that most of the 98.6% are just not being jerks.

First, to think that Riot can't figure out what your main account is just because you are posting from a smurf is pretty naive. Secondly, Shiister, did you kill puppies on a regular basis before I came onto this forum? It's either that or people just have an irrational hatred of you. Third, you need to be reported in a percentage of recent games to get Tribunal flagged... so if you play alot of games, unless you're reported in a bunch of games in succession, you shouldn't have more of a chance to get in the Tribunal than another level 30 with less games. That's the fun of percentages, their actual number increases as the whole does.

This brought manly tears of joy to me.

Oh another nametroll. How delightfully original of you.