I don't see afkers or dcers often enough for this to be an issue.

I'd prefer if 3 people voting surrender would surrender the game. 3 is the majority of 5. When the enemy has 20 kills, and we have 3. When we've taken 0 turrets and the enemy has taken 4. Time and time again I see 2 idiots saying no at the 20 ff vote. Get fed, we can still win. Now that's frustrating.

Ok, some people are mistaken. IF someone Leaves/afks for 5 minutes or manually abandons the game, then the game is marked safe to leave and no one else is penalized for leaving. The winning team still gets their win (if they push the ancient or all of the other team leaves) and the other team will still lose, its just a lot faster than waiting for them to push.

its to end unbalanced games faster, the losing players still lose match making points.

I liked this idea up until the point where you decided to give the team who still has 5 a free win that the opposing team had no chance of winning.

If the person never connected and the game was marked safe to leave then no one on either team should receive anything for staying. No harm, no foul.

bump.

I consider LoL to be one of the absolute most stressful games I've played (behind World of warcraft and its stupid ass RNG) and safe to leave would effectively remove a decent portion of the stress.

Yes, it's a good feature. Too bad I got a lot of flack for posting it on EUNE. LoL fanboys can be really ignorant.