Dont know why you guys integrated this new system, ever since it was inegrated everyone has been challenging it and see how far they can go before they get banned, plus with the new system and how you guys balance players with each other, the good players get set with bad players causing someone like me (who is good at the game) to get aggravated and end up getting a noob or someone who is butt hurt easily to cause a problem in a game that i am playing, cause i am normally good with someone until they say something negative or a smart ass comment towards me, just saying might want to look into that as well, it penalizes people of my nature to an extent where we can get banned for something that we didnt even do wrong, when we arent the instigators.

Not really a fan of the above proposal.

I largely stopped participating in the Tribunal when the IP gains stopped because I was a primarily co-op versus AI player at the time; I used the Tribunal to make up for the IP difference while believing I was helping clean-up the toxic PvP portion, so it would be a better place for when I returned. I spent a great deal of time examining each case carefully. It could have been spent playing more games; it felt like a good incentive then.

When, it swapped over to the brief Halls of Justice, I wasn't really concerned about ranking, so I lost interest along with early bugs in the system (prior to making it so first case was better shuffled around); I just didn't feel the incentive anymore. Seeing how many people pardoned very blatant horrible behavior at the time bothered me. I chose to simply make a difference in game with the honor initiative.

So I don't really like the idea of adding more incentive to a privatized ladder portion as the trade-off already put me off. That's more of a result of the prior discussions on player behavior and it being more stick than carrot (prior to the Santa Baron icon).

Never really was concerned about the matter of anonymity in the Tribunal; I can understand why it would bother some players based off their involvement with the game.

In the Tribunal I have on many occasions seen players report abuse in the team chat before or after a game. However, because I am not given that data I can't really take it into account, furthermore I personally have dealt with people who are horrible in the team chat before and after games because they know they can't be tracked. I think it is something that should be fixed.

Lyte a few months ago I was warned for cases that were months prior, then like 2-3 days after I was warned I was banned for games that were weeks before my warning was issued. Is this being addressed, if so how? I ask because when I was warned I was actively seeking to improve my behavior and then I got banned and lost interest in the game for a bit as it turned me off. Though I came back (and banned again -.-" and am going to improve my behavior again) I do hope that this is being reviewed as it can be quite the turn off.

1) as can be seen on the various posts in here, there are definitely people who consider it a goal to have high accuracy (which actually runs counter to the idea of the Tribunal).

2) spam punishers as of last update about the tribunal would actually have higher accuracy ratings than average. Their vote also has a weight.

Thought I'd FYI that into the thread.

thanks for the updates on the tribunal should help out alot of people