I was just in a game which turned into a 3v5 by the 10 minute mark. Those kinds of games aren't fun for anyone, and one usually just want them to get over with as quickly as possible. In games with multiple disconnects, could the surrender system be modified to allow surrenders earlier if someone disconnects?

agreed with this

Riot?

I am actually less opposed to this now that leaver-buster has been implemented

so many leavers... so unbareable..

Allow surrender any time teams are off by 2 or more players.

Allow surrender any time that teams have been off by 1 player for 5 consecutive minutes.

Drop surrender threshold to 50% if a team meets all three of: Kill ratio lower than 1:2, has suffered at least 10 deaths, and is down by 2 or more towers.

If a player does not issue any commands during surrender countdown, calculate surrender as if they weren't there.


There, surrenders fixed.

yeah 25 minutes is way too long. it should be at 20 minutes. Then for each disconnect take of 4 minutes, and it should work. But people only surrender if they are losing, so it works out. Sometimes you can still win, but when its hopeless at 19 minutes because someone just fed the other team 10 kills, its over.

Just my opinion.
But i think that the answer to that isnt in the surrender time.
Most of my friends have at least 1 game like these per day, generally more (i had 3 yesterday, and 2 today).
So, i think that the punishment for the ones that leaves the team, should be more severe.
I liked the changes in the leave status, but it is kinda too soft, today i saw a guy with 153 leaves, leaving another game, and most of the players in that game already had more than 30 leaves. That is way too much.
I also see a lot of games there one player just stays in the base dancing or whatever. I report those guys every time, but they keep appearing.

What Riot says about being more severe with those kinds of players?