I know this maybe a strange suggestion or may have even been brought up before but I would like think to ask if it would be totally unreasonable for when players review a case in the tribunal that they then have an option after reviewing the case to give an opinion on why they came to this decision.

It seems reasonable to me that in some cases it might be nice for those of the higher up to know why it is a person came to the decision that they did. I know that not everybody takes the Tribunal seriously when they do it but I for one do and know there are plenty of other players out there that do as well and sometimes I'd like to leave a comment or two on why I felt the decision I came to was reasonable and why I believe that player deserved punishment.

I don't particularly think that it is too unreasonable or think too many will spam such a thing comment section with things like "Ban this player for "X" reason" but will hope it to be a more constructive and informative means such as "The reason why I felt this player deserved the punish decision was because of "X" and "Y" and how often they tended to do "X" and how little they failed to adhere to "Y" and think that if this player was informed of "A" or "B" it might help them to better understand why it is that people felt they should be punished."

I of course full understand that the higher up who have to review these cases will not read every little gripe and concern but feel it would be nice addition and something that might benefit the tribunal.

This is just one persons opinions and I would be more than happy to hear everybody elses thought and concern on this matter.

Allowing people to comment on Tribunal cases from within the case would actually be pretty interesting. It might cut down on the more obvious cases being posted here.

It'd have to be anonymous just like the rest of the Tribunal though, otherwise I can see people harassing their judges for voting "punish" on their case.

I've been suspended a handful of times, and I've found that the way you respond to trolls ingame doesn't evade the inevitable report. If people are acting toxically ingame, and you swear at them, the language isn't what's ruining the game, yet that's what i've been suspended for over 4 times now. Infact, if you're doing such a good job, how come i've been reported for nothing by an enemy player, with no chat in the game, and been judged punish. Did I mention most of my reports are such?

Also may I say that your idea of a troll build should not be in anyway valid to the the report, so what someone builds what you don't want, that's not your choice, I've gone straight BT's and won with over a 20kd. Also, some people are noobs, give them a break.

so.... I accidentally punished someone I meant to pardon. Is there a way to go back and change my vote? This player definitely didn't deserve punishment and I was like "he is totally innocent" (and then I accidentally clicked the big red button).

plz halp

Lyte,

Thanks for taking the time to read our feedback and answer our questions.

I've just started using the Tribunal and doing my best to help the community, but in several of the reports that I've dealt with, there are also some players, but not the reported player, in the report that I think should be flagged for review. For example, if you were able to pull up case #6254650 and look at the first "report", the Zyra in game claims to "work at Riot". There have been other times, too, when the reported player's team is actually just being a huge d-bag to the reported player, but we have no way of flagging that entire person's team for abusive behavior.

Is there a way to work on this or at least flag it for a secondary/lower weight report than if it were reported by the people in game?