Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorRush
Quote:
|
When challenged in the past with dramatic story problems by players it has been the lore team's response to ignore the criticism and release the lore unchanged anyway, as will likely happen with the lore of Warwick and Soraka despite an outcry by several players who will never be answered in their feedback. The concerned players use their spare time to attempt to stop bad decisions from being made, the lore team uses its spare time to play "happy wolfpeople lovetime quest". The idea of failing to deliver in their duties to form a compelling story is clearly not keeping the lore team up at night, which is a pity because in fact in the opinion of many players they are failing.
|
Really? What about Katarina? What about Jayce? What about the two words that were Lux's ultimate?
|
None of these were fixed to the satisfaction of the players, the Katarina AMA is ongoing with unanswered problems, there were bad reactions to the continued portrayal of Victor as a villain in Jayce's lore (who still reads like a minion-accompanied Mighty Morphin Power Ranger antagonist), there were dozens of threads demanding that the name Lux's ultimate should not be changed
at all and represented a genius reference to a blockbuster anime series called "Touhou" (which I've personally never seen but still support over the blasé new implementation). The lore team proceeded anyway in each of these instances over the protests of the players, claiming victory through a compromise that still gave them exactly what they wanted. During the discussion of the flaws in Syndra's lore (
which were never addressed) there were scores of players citing these exact examples as endemic of a wider malaise rotting through the core of the game. If you don't visit the wider forums very much or only bother to read Riot posts within threads you may not be aware of the overpowering consensus now formed throughout the playerbase which condemns these foolhardy alterations, yet condemned they remain.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorRush
Quote:
|
I further went on to suggest in deeper illustration of this idea that member of the lore team are goofing-off on different internet outlets, by this I did not mean that they were rapt and waiting for valuable interaction with the players on the subject of doing high-quality work. I mean that they are watching the intellectual equivalent of stupid cat videos. What gives credence to this idea? Economic productivity reports on what sites employees commonly waste time on,
|
Of course the vast majority of everything is junk. Why do people use those sites at all if research says its worthless? Because value comes from the individual, not the medium.
|
Your platitude is ill-applied. Research says that using recreational heroin is worthless, yet people use it, and not because value comes from the individual heroin user separate from the medium. Heroin users, and those who waste time on sites like Facebook, are weak. Genetic heritability factors and environmental pressures combine to lead these users to seek entertainment through a non-enriching past-time that damages their relationships and work quality. Both demonstrate a marked disregard for the individual's creative products, and also billions of dollars of lost productivity every year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorRush
Quote:
|
secondly the poor quality of the lore output clearly lacking foresight or care recently (as well as flow or musicality),
|
That's subjective. As I said before, these are the Lore Discussion forums. If you feel that way about something (what is "clear" to you is not always clear to anyone else), open a discussion. I and the rest of the Lore Forum will be happy to tell you what we think.
|
I hold with the aforementioned consensus built upon a thousand angry player-posts. Your further affirmation of the validity of my views is not required, especially since I have gone in-depth already in this thread about what I see as Warwick/Soraka lore problems and you nor anyone else has presented a challenge to these views. I don't think that you have read this thread, how could I assume that you would read a separate thread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorRush
Quote:
|
thirdly the past instances where champion designers have felt the need to create lore themselves for champions as a primary director, like Leona and Diana, in what is in effect a no-confidence vote for the resident lore experts of the company.
|
I don't know how you came to that conclusion. Ironstylus still defers to Runaan in terms of lore. He simply drew inspiration from his wife to meet the community demand for a female tank.
|
He also "simply" claimed with Morello to have written over a hundred extra pages of lore for Diana during a General Discussion overview which I am going to guess that you didn't read.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorRush
Quote:
|
Fourthly in some cases we actually have access to viewing the pages of the lore team on time-wasting sites and it would seem that they mainly seek to capitalize on the name-recognition brought by their titles to gain a wider attention for their own personal musings on subjects non-related to the game League of Legends, and
|
They're not exactly paid to do that. They're gamers too. They talk about their work in their spare time in addition to whatever else they would do. I actually can't speak much about it, since I don't use those sites. However, the point is, Rioters are accessible.
|
Under your definition large rocks are accessible. You can scream at them for years, visit them frequently and they will never answer or take your critiques into account, but in your view it seems that this would be a worthwhile relationship.
According to President Tryndamere in several posts (in the General Discussion forum) Riot employees are paid to do one thing: deliver awesomeness to the fullest extent of their abilities. Not ignore players and churn out execrable bilge collaboratively defecated out of an offensively illiterate and derivative slurry-nozzle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorRush
Quote:
|
fifth-ly Zileas has mentioned that Hollywood television writers were recently brought in for Project X, where, as we know, all the previous lore team besides Babaganoush remains intact and has had several months without producing anything publicly to either work or "explore the concepts" of lore improvements, which again doesn't seem to place confidence in the abilities of the lore team.
|
I actually haven't seen that. (Man, I could look that up, but, then again, I could care less until it's released)
|
I doubt that you could look it up given the amount of motivation or interest you have already failed to display, but here you go:
http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/...73222#28673222
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorRush
Lore is on the way. They have a top secret lore project they are preparing. Rewrites are merely signs of what is coming. While you may not appreciate their quality, I believe it is because they are only small parts of a larger whole. You can't judge a book by its cover. If it's all you have to judge, judge collectively. Talk to the lore forums and see what other people think.
I read the rest of your points as "not happy with how lore is being delivered." In my eyes, lore is barely being delivered at all. Improvements must be made. However, it appears you would prefer that these AMAs were like Ezreal's AMA (open forever, responded to once a month, ... one for every champion?). I would not. I think that is a waste of time. They are busy working on the next big thing.
|
A sign of what is coming indeed! Strap in ThorRush. We're about to take a ride on sludge mountain, and the meaty grease drippings sprayed upon your unsuspecting face are only a small parts of a larger upcoming whole! The precedents have been cast, Project X stirs beneath a series of terrible drafts, and now we learn the true depths of Total Creative Despair!