You fail to understand and have not answered my question in full. Also note how you're still trying to insult me, meanwhile I haven't said anythng like that to you whatsoever.
How is it not enough evidence, saying coincidental is an opinion and strictly an opinion at that.
-The man looks up at an angle
-The man pings within half of a second after on top of the enemy teams location after looking up at an angle
-Then a Jayce Q is myseriously shot into the top brush to "check it" merely 10 seconds or so after the intial glance ping was made previously
3 things that all sync up pretty damn well, coincidental is not the word to be used.
I think it is too coincidental to be considered solid proof, how can I dissect that any further dude?
Stop trying to take the moral high ground, you this argument was civil until you started being condescending, I don't feel like remaining civil when that's the case.