Originally Posted by StumpyJoe

You fail to understand and have not answered my question in full. Also note how you're still trying to insult me, meanwhile I haven't said anythng like that to you whatsoever.

How is it not enough evidence, saying coincidental is an opinion and strictly an opinion at that.

-The man looks up at an angle
-The man pings within half of a second after on top of the enemy teams location after looking up at an angle
-Then a Jayce Q is myseriously shot into the top brush to "check it" merely 10 seconds or so after the intial glance ping was made previously

3 things that all sync up pretty damn well, coincidental is not the word to be used.

Originally Posted by StumpyJoe

You fail to understand and have not answered my question in full. Also note how you're still trying to insult me, meanwhile I haven't said anythng like that to you whatsoever.

How is it not enough evidence, saying coincidental is an opinion and strictly an opinion at that.

-The man looks up at an angle
-The man pings within half of a second after on top of the enemy teams location after looking up at an angle
-Then a Jayce Q is myseriously shot into the top brush to "check it" merely 10 seconds or so after the intial glance ping was made previously

3 things that all sync up pretty damn well, coincidental is not the word to be used.

Originally Posted by StumpyJoe

You fail to understand and have not answered my question in full. Also note how you're still trying to insult me, meanwhile I haven't said anythng like that to you whatsoever.

How is it not enough evidence, saying coincidental is an opinion and strictly an opinion at that.

-The man looks up at an angle
-The man pings within half of a second after on top of the enemy teams location after looking up at an angle
-Then a Jayce Q is myseriously shot into the top brush to "check it" merely 10 seconds or so after the intial glance ping was made previously

3 things that all sync up pretty damn well, coincidental is not the word to be used.

Originally Posted by StumpyJoe

You fail to understand and have not answered my question in full. Also note how you're still trying to insult me, meanwhile I haven't said anythng like that to you whatsoever.

How is it not enough evidence, saying coincidental is an opinion and strictly an opinion at that.

-The man looks up at an angle
-The man pings within half of a second after on top of the enemy teams location after looking up at an angle
-Then a Jayce Q is myseriously shot into the top brush to "check it" merely 10 seconds or so after the intial glance ping was made previously

3 things that all sync up pretty damn well, coincidental is not the word to be used.

Originally Posted by EightFortyFive

http://na.leagueoflegends.com/board/....php?t=2653010


Read this you stupid idiot,

and are you ****ing serious from THAT picture that they cheated?

I was there for whole 3 days, and you'd know you CANT cheat by looking at the map for 0.01 sec

re-watch the stupid games again, and analyze if azubu really won from cheating

Originally Posted by Rabscuttles

No, I have answered your question, I have stated I do not think it enough. Can you please tell me why you think it is enough? Not just what happened, WHY that is enough.

I think it is too coincidental to be considered solid proof, how can I dissect that any further dude?

Stop trying to take the moral high ground, you this argument was civil until you started being condescending, I don't feel like remaining civil when that's the case.

Originally Posted by dont rage at me

proof

http://i.imgur.com/hntqU.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/dZ592.jpg

his is blatant cheating
http://www.twitch.tv/riotgames/b/334537601?t=5h32m52s
Notice they go top and jayce fires into the bush because he knew they were there, such bull****

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"We keep a constant watch on all the players on stage at all times. We have cameras as well as live people walking onto stage to keep tabs in everything. All players are told that they need to remain sitting, facing forward, and with headphones on at all times, including during pauses." From the head referee on the forums. If this is the case and the teams were aware then surely this is grounds for a DQ?



Riot needs to go through the footage on the cameras in front of the players to see if he really did look up there. They also need to get a translator and figure out what azubu frost was saying during the start of the match.. Maybe one of them says "they are sending 4 top" or something super obvious. The team needs to be DQ'd from this tournament and all future riot hosted tournaments. Cheating is unacceptable.

Originally Posted by StumpyJoe

Ok then riddle me this, How is it not enough evidence? By what basis is it just coincidental? Be more specific.

I'm in no way saying what you input is not worth reading, I'm merely talking about how you are just pushing the same statement over and over. "coincidental" it's like your favorite word and the answer to almost all my posts.

Why do I think it's enough? 3 things that are plain seen that all happen in a 30 second window. I've already highlighted the 3 obvious factors, but lets throw out the first one that you seem to claim isn't enough. Let's say he wasn't looking at the screen, and was just looking up by chance.

So now we have the other two oddities, he strangely now pings at random on top of the enemy team. Then Jayce strangely fires Q into the top brush to check it after traversing top the tribrush for no reason.