Originally Posted by Layorz
Any relevant evidence.
Riot are not impartial. It is not in their best interest to admit the cheating happened after they've cleared it already and stated several times they believe nothing bad happened.
Haven't some players involved admitted it? And you are mistaking a right to defend themselves with a right to remain silent. A suspect does not need to actually defend themselves to be charged; if a thief never speaks and never defends himself and rejects all charges, he can still be put away for theft.
the judge or jury is never impartial (sorry, we are human beings
) unfortunately, all justice systems currently in use still depend on a person or a group of persons that are not impartial. just lets hope they are as lose to impartiality as they can
is GD impartial? is anyone impartial? saying riot is invalid as a judge is just a correct as stating GD is invalid as a jury. thats the truth of it.
and ill apologize now for my bad wording. last i checked you have a right to defense, as in a lawyer to defend yourself in a court of law. yes, some people have admitted it (so thats intentionally giving up your right) but to my knowledge, most of the teams did some sort of screen watching (successful or not, should be considered cheating)
and also, a theif who doesn't speak and never defends himself can still go free, if the evidence is not conclusive enough.