Originally Posted by Kades
How is 'stop feeding' productive advice? That's pure rage, yo. Plain and simple.
You think the guy at the other end of the computer (who is obviously having a miserable game), is going to read 'stop feeding' and be like:
"Oooooohhh...! That's what I'm doing wrong. Thanks for the tip! I'll just... stop."
Next time, try 'Bot lane, just play passive for now- we're letting them snowball. We'll catch you back up by midgame." or "Hey (*jungler*), when you get a sec, could you camp bot for a bit? We're going to have problems later if they keep snowballing from here and I think mid and I will be fine without the ganks."
Or better yet, if his lane is behind and you know they're not going to be able to turn it around, offer if they'd like to swap lanes with you.
But don't ever mistake "stop feeding" as constructive criticism. Or anything but what it is: the petulant whining of someone who is so self-involved that he'd prefer to vent his rage at his teammates rather than endure his tribulations stoically, help his team overcome them, and then carry them to victory.
Well i dont know about you but when i have my game thrown by people who have given up and im going to lose ELO for it, im not gonna try to help them. With that score, they have past taking advice. Sorry bud, but not everybody is a respected Rioter.
Plus, if they are doing that bad, i greatly doubt they will take that advice and say, "Thanks, we should play passive, because with them 23 kills ahead of us, the tower will still make an enormous difference!" No. They will tower dive them, keep getting fed. Jungler ganks? LOL OK BRO. Sure, underfed and probably negative score from ganking bot jungler goes bot, tries to kill a 25-2 lane. You then proceed to get 2v3ed and you get them ahead even more.
Seriously, you have to realize that after a lane like that, the bot lane would probably just be afk in base waiting for 20 minutes to come for the surrender.