She is a support, so I guess the armor isn't really needed?
Anyways, again, you're really making a mountain out of a relatively small issue. Things were said, a champ who was being designed at the time conflicted with things said, rather than scrap the design they released as-is, why can't that just be it?
You agree with the community there is a pattern of problems with champs. You see a problem with a specific champs design but you're forced to push ahead with release, then predictably there is some unrest related to the problem.
You might feel defensive, which might manifest as anger. You might feel unhappy or be apologetic. Right? But would you post claiming you see no problems with the champs design and then make fun of the people who do? That's just not believable. It doesn't make any sense to respond with humor and derision in that scenario.
The conclusion that IronStylus doesn't actually take this as seriously as he initially claimed seems far more likely to me. You see my thought process here?