Originally Posted by mogonk
No. That hasn't been "proven". Because that's ****ing stupid. How about you go read the APA report on exactly this topic before you make yourself look more ignorant than you already have.
I'm just joking, we both know you've never read work of scholarship in your life and aren't going to start now.
Have a nice day.
The American Psychological Association's data was interpreted by
Why don't you take a break from wasting your time reading supposed scientific studies, and instead use it to Google words and phrases like interpret, conjecture, meta-study, stupid, idiot, are people that read 4chan stupid, are people that cite meta-studies stupid, do real scientific studies require an interpreter - go ahead, pal. I'll wait.
edit: and really? You're going for some intellectual angle so, of course, you cite a random META-STUDY with COMPILED DATA and use that to.. bash a corporation for utilizing their market data? Their target demographic is 90% male between the ages of 16-30. Sorry, but breasts sell to that demographic you god damn dolt. So you have a problem with sexuality being sold in corporate America, or just when it's sold to males?
Are you on a Twilight forum right now, also insulting their creation process? What about Brawny brand paper towels? You know about that I hope, if you weren't to busy scouring meta-studies for their inscrutable, interpreted data. You are such a rube, it isn't even funny. The difference between you and some random woman with an anti-homosexual sign threatening the rapture is that someone taught you how to use punctuation.