Well if you havent noticed this section of the forum has blown up over the past week so they are just not quite as notable. Do a search for their names they are still around.

Personally I still hit punish for the use of noob and other terms because I still find it unacceptable. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion however.

Aww, look at that.

Email's all alone and can't troll anymore.

Must hurt trying to be right when nobody cares </3.

I'll admit that I have been a little surprised by a few of the results I've seen. But by the same token, I know that I'm fairly strict on some things. Negative Attitude, specifically. It seems that the majority lets it go as long as it isn't paired with a bunch of cursing or rage. And that's fine by me. I'm okay with missing those cases. At least I know I've agreed with all the votes I've put in.

But as for the members you mentioned, maybe they just got busy with life. It was a weekend. And if any of them live in the northeast, they could be preoccupied with other things atm.

I know there are people who do punish at the slightest incident, and that is not even bad. But those other posters tried to dictate everyone towards their way of justice in a way that itself would be punishable by their own definition.

Oh, and I did search some the names, and their activity heavily decreased the last days.

I have been on the prowl; >.>

Love you too, cupcake.

I don't remember any of them "aggressively campaigning to ban for a single usage of "noob"".

Actually, the influx of ridiculous threads has kept me from being as active as I used to be. There have been soooo many "This ban is unfair! Tribunal is broke!" threads where the OP is simple trying to justify their terrible actions.

Yes, there have been cases that should have been pardoned, and cases that should have been punished, but the majority of the threads are punished cases that should have been punished and are filled with OP's trying to make piss-poor excuses for their actions. They are pointless to post in, which is probably the reason a lot of the people you mentioned haven't been as active.

The reform cards for the most part still back up what we have always said. Not sure what point you are actually trying to make here.

That is not something the OP believes at all.

You use to read the forums with a bias.


You're not a person with the behavior I descried. You're a case on your own that differs.


Actually it is. But one can only see that, when he argues with me without a bias, because I will not talk after your mouth just because you desire a "we" and a "being part of the majority" feeling (yes, this is one single point of said behavior that applies to you, however you're not as offensive and aggressive as the others so that's not a problem).

However we've had enough threads to discuss your bias and the effect it has on the way you post.

lol oh this again.

Then, Mr. Uber-Unbiased-Man, please show me where they campaigned for it. Please, I mean...it should easy since it was "aggressive".

I understand that, but I simple put why I haven't posted as much because I would place a bet that it is the same reason they haven't posted as much.

The only reason you think I have a bias is because I disagree with you a lot. You ignore the times I do agree with you, though. I have noticed that. Was I being bias at those times? Or were those just a few moments of unbiased posting?

I don't care about being part of the majority. In fact, as a Tribunal supporter I feel like a part of the minority round these parts.

It's fairly obvious that this forum is heavily biased in favor of being pro tribunal. I have no idea why you would think otherwise.