It makes the decision extremely biased to vote for punish when most people don't read what the person's team is saying/doing, which is a good indicator if they have premade trolls on their team. Just a suggestion to help balance out the tribunal voting process.

Could you show us an example of a case where the person deserved a Pardon because of what was being said by their teammates?

What does it matter what the rest of the team is doing?

Being trolled does not give someone an excuse to rage and berate others.

I still read all of the chat, but the purple color just helps to keep track of who is saying what.

oh no, i meant like cases where what they're saying isn't verbal abuse, but they get baited into defending themselves and arguing with premades.

For my voting, when I see people being toxic, I always think about the other people in the game that aren't participating in the toxic behavior.

Person 2 is in the tribunal, but Person 1 started it. Both are extremely toxic. I don't care who started it, I care that Persons 3-10 have to listen to this garbage and their game is ruined.

EDIT: Can you find a case to use as an example?