What I am saying is:

When it is pretty obvious that person is verbally abusing one or more people, then it is generally not needed to read the chat from everyone, but just the purple chat, which is the accused player's chat.


Besides, even in most cases where "he started it", it is not needed to read other people's chats.

One player is judged by his own behavior, if his behavior is one or more of these
and such, then no, we don't need to read "all the chat", but only the accused player's chat (that was your question, not if we read every chat to the end). Because NOTHING said or done by other players would excuse it.

Whats wrong with being "one sided" anyway? We are there to vote to punish ONE player, not the whole team.



BTW, where did you get the number that 85-90% players doesn't read the whole chat? It is a very good statistics, if you can prove it as true, that is it.

OH and you just restated what my forum TITLE said so thank you.

again, refer back to my post.

also...

and to quote the FAQ...

it's more of a theoretical number oh and there's plenty of things wrong with being one sided, as you have just proved me correct again with that statement, and the tribunal is meant to be "fair and just to everyone" so by being one sided you are breaking your precious tribunal even more, thank you for proving me correct even more.

You quoted yourself, meaning you just thanked yourself for restating something you had already stated before.

Congratulations on that.

Like Conker's Bad Fur Day, it's context-sensitive. Sometimes it's the lesser of two evils, and while report worthy, the context makes it a bit more understandable on why you say it. I did think was not a great thing to say on your part, but at the same time, I do feel it's a justified retort. I would let something that minor slip by.

However, when I see:

I don't need context. You're being an ass, and being an ass gets you reported and banned.

is this kid really indenial? do you have no clue what you've been saying? get some self control.

you can refer back to mine aswell, as you simply didn't understand what I was saying, if you didn't ask me I'll be happy to tell you, I'm not as nice as other people act to be nice.

never once have I denied anything I even said I deserve the ban and report, I'm only venting my frustrations on how the tribunal is broken, and through your statement you have proven that you do not read anything either, and if you do read things you lack the mental capacity to understand the things being said, if you couldn't understand that I basically just called you stupid.

This post got ignored.

But what is it that you're struggling with most here? You said you didn't want people to tell you deserved the ban. I haven't said that. I'm willing to have a discussion with you about the system in general, regardless of what I think of your individual reform card (which I haven't looked at yet).

After you digest the two points in the quoted portion of this post, what else is it that you struggle with regarding the Tribunal?