Originally Posted by Pacyf
system might simply allow players to give 1 bonus and 1 negative for players they think deserve it in relation to other participants in that game.Viola, you have individual evaluation of performance that is not impacting the game itself.
Furthermore it would encourage players to keep trying even when other lanes are failing.Big problem in solo q is people giving up too fast and just not trying anymore, becouse no matter what they do they wil lloose/ gain same amount.
You now have a system that involves appeasing players who as you said before, Suck and are holding you down, they don't have a good opinion of what skill is. They simply aren't qualified to be able to award elo to someone.
As for 50% wining.Its fundamental of current elo system, that is even said by riot.
In fact it is fundamental for any elo system.Problem is its not designed for evaluating individual participants in team games.
You yourself said that player that should be in higher elo win more than 50% games, which implies if they are right elo they win 50% games.
He might have different result than 50% on his way to that elo.Or short term results.But long term outcome of games in right elo will always be 50%.
You are right. When you are at your correct elo you will have essentially a 50% chance of winning
However It is apparent that you are not understanding how the elo system works and what the consequences of adding elo for actions not winning or losing, let me explain.
Your elo is a reflection of your skill. If you are a 1400 skilled player. You will always gravitate to 1400. When you are at 1400 you have a 50% chance to win. But your elo is being boosted artificially through non winning/losing actions. But you are still a 1400 player which means you still will gravitate to 1400, however it will take you more losses to get to 1400, so by the time you get back to 1400 where you belong, you will have lower than 50% winrate, once you make it to 1400 again. You will have a 50/50 chance of winning THAT game. However you will have lost more games than you won
As for replay.You already stated your opinion haveing absolutely no knowledge about how i play, now you want to see gameplayes to just find anything that would make absolutely random statement feel valid.
Its forming a thesis and than looking for any facts that would make thesis seem plausible.
To make what you say anything but a trolls blabbering you'd have to at least preserve appearesences that you form a thesis from a facts ;P - too late for this.
Oh I know you are terrible at the game. From your complaining about your teammates, to your lack of fundamental game theory concepts, even if you had amazing mechanics(I have a strong suspicion you don't. But even if you did) you still would be making tons of elementary mistakes due to your weak knowledge of the game.
I offered you to prove me wrong. I'm 100% confident that you belong very close to your elo just based on your statements. But you are welcome to show yourself to be the exception to the 150+ replays I've gone over, hell if you show me wrong. I'll publicly apologize and throw in a $25 riot card. All you have to do is show me a couple of games where you played well but your team held you back and the games were unwinnable had you played better