Oh no. My opinion before was much worse. You executed many more successful engagements than I anticipated.

Its your replay and you were the support role. By critiquing your play I'm able to show that the game was winnable if anyone on your team stepped up a little bit.

I did answer your question about why graves and trynd both deserve the same amount of elo loss. Graves really didn't play all that great. He made some critical mistakes that costs you the game just as much as trynd did.

If you would like, I would be happy to go through the game and analyze graves play step by step, to show his mistakes. It does appear however that you have already made up your mind on the issue. You want someone to blame and you will die defending trynd to be that scapegoat. He made some bad decisions. But no worse than anyone else in that game

"41:20 since trynd went bot, back off baron, take free inhib, you gotta call the team off there take the free inhib tower, bait the baron you can win a 4v4 there."

Didn't read rest of your blabber, but this one cought my eye.It shows exactly why your opinion is too biased to make any jundgements.

I do what you think should have been done, but in your little brain you refuse to see the facts and dont acknowledge it.

I am calling my team off. I ping to move back, i back off a little to make my team back off, but they just refuse to listen. But according to you its 100% my fault even tough i do what you say RIGHT?

I recommend you read the entire post even if you know you played bad. You still might learn something.

As to the baron play.

I actually can see pings in the replay and no you weren't pinging your team. Every single player on your team is equally to blame for incorrectly playing that scenario. You wanna know the funny part? Trynd was the most correct there. While he's also responsible for not calling you off there. He had the most correct strategy. You have no reasonable expectation of securing baron in that situation, with the enemy team comp they had. They had ezreal down but not for long, you needed to get an inhibitor down before you could take baron. Getting their team out of base to take their inhib was the right move. But actually going through with the baron attempt was very bad.

As far as your personal responsibility. There's 2 parts. You should of pinked baron. Backed off and tried to get your team away, you can only do so much I understand. You just didn't do everything you could have.

The 2nd part, while it's not your fault entirely what went down at baron. Had you personally played just a little better a minute or so before the attempt, the baron secure would have been a non issue, so is it 100% your fault? If you want to avoid personal responsibility I suppose there are others to share the blame, I personally couldn't do that. If that were me and I looked at that game. I'd be mad at myself and blaming myself 100% for those mistakes. And the loss