Quote:
Originally Posted by McFace
The first part of this is not 100% true, but I suspect you know that. If you play as Ez then you should know that adc can poke right along with the support, especially in certain lanes (Sona/Ez is a good example).
I feel like everyone should buy wards. Does a bigger burden fall on the support to ward? Yes, of course. But if everyone wards then it spreads the pressure around and you get more map vision.
|
While yes, Ez CAN poke - it's very mana intensive, and unless they're positioned just god awfully, he can't realistically poke. Sure, poke when you can - but ultimately that job falls to the support. It's familiar to Blitz - yes he's awesome...when your opponents don't know how to position. Obviously this changes on games, and at my low elo I'd obviously be poking along with my support, and I do, but I've already seen a few games where I never got a chance to Q in lane without Eing first(and there I got first blood, that my support poked down to 50% for me.

)
I really don't think ADCs should buy wards. I main mid, I play top occasionally, and I play support occasionally(I hate jungle), and I do feel that both top and mid have the obligation to ward - and I feel pink wards don't go amiss in top, but I feel the ADC should save his gold for getting to his end-game ASAP. While Supports, and Jungles win games - ADC is the primary tool that they use.
But moving back to my OP: I don't think my fundamental question came to light:
Why should you learn more than one ADC? or said another way: When would you pick a different ADC? Ignoring for a second low elo, or pubstomping niche teams(like Galio/Amumu Galio/Orianna/Annie MF Sona Malphite), in what scenario is it better to pick..say Ezrael over Kayle or Graves over Miss Fortune?