Actually, that first thing was said after Ahri tried to turret dive his opponent. (Yes, I remember the game.)


Hell, I'm inclined to agree.

Actually, that was a one-time thing since the game was going exceptionally well. You'll note how the "ROAMJAX!" stopped after two fifths of the team left.

I learned some time ago that The Tribunal is a lot like RIOT; agree with their actions or not, you know they usually have some reason for it.

I know I am a little late to this but thought I would comment.

This is a borderline case. In fact, I probably would have pardoned and I am a bit stricter than most. However, I think the only reason any one punished was because of the "I am above my team and do what I want mentality". Now I am not saying don't play what you want to play, cause you should play what you want. Maybe, dont broadcast it as much? Instead of "I play roamJax cause I want to" when they clearly asked you to play ADC, simply say "ADC is not my best. I am going to roam with Jax to help as much as I can"

I would also like to thank you for being level headed in here. It doesnt happen to often.

Don't worry 'bout my taking it the wrong way. I know full well you're just trying to help me out. If you ever manage to log on again, feel free to add me. Always nice to have level-headed people on my list.

I fail to see how this is borderline? Ahri just spams report him over and over. He did well in his games. Doesn't look like trolling. Just a few kids who don't get to play how they are use to and they spam report. Easy Pardon.

Interesting, I think 2 and 4 were reports due to your name having a religious connotation. Not sure what the rules are for religious names but those 2 at least are a result of hypersensitivity.

Nether said what I was thinking, game 2 is a clear report because someone doesn't like your summoner name. I think it is an ok name, but can see how some crazy people may get offended by it.

I know it's rather late into this all, but I still would like to get at least some contrary opinions on here. The ban is nearly up, but there's something to be learned from this.

On the face of it I would have pardoned, and I am probably on the harsher (but I like to think fair) side of judges

Things I would take away from this for you
- Why did you even end up in the tribunal, remember you need to be reported in 15% or more of your games played as a rule of thumb to even end up with a case in the tribunal
- Judging by the nature of the reports, I would come to the conclusion that you are simply inclined to do whatever you want, during champ select and in game.
- While there is no obligation to adhere to a strict meta, as has been stated by Reds, it is a team game so you are expected try and work as a team.
- I may be incorrect on that assumption, perhaps your pre/post game chat is offensive or something else.

I wouldn't focus to hard on these specific 5 cases if I was you, none of which are really bad, but rather reflect on why you got reported enough to even end up in the tribunal in the first place.

Hope that helps.

This game is about winning. I see no problems with your case. Whilest you are being a bit of a ******bag your scores reflect that youre not a terrible player. I would rather play with you then all the softies out there who get offended so easily.

No, the game isn't about winning. It's about having fun, which all games are about. If Lol was about winning, then Ranked would be the only game mode and playing badly would be bannable.