60% is the lowest ive ever seen the number. people have spammed punish as tests, and it is always between 70-80%. And no i dont honestly trust lyte. since he contradicts his own system whenever he needs to come into a thread and he will use information we did not have to determine that riot will do nothing. If he is going to step in he should use the same information we were given in the tribunal to make a decision. Riot downright refuses to admit there are ANY flaws in their system, and always strive to make it look better than it is.
according to lyte just being in the tribunal is bannable since it takes so many reports to get there... but if that's true every case should have at least 5 games to judge.
fewer reports would be good because it means people are being nicer to each other.
Do we really want to just punish? or would we like to reform?
As for the community deciding the rules... We have one of if not the worst community in the gaming world... You really want that community deciding things?
According to Lyte as well it takes hundreds of reports to get into the Tribunal. Not every game is presented, only a random sample.
I don't see the fewer reports having an impact. Before the Tribunal, people were being nasty to each other. After the Tribunal, people were being nasty to each other, but could be reported for their nastiness.
Sure. I think that the majority of the community is decent, as with most of humanity. There are 'bad apples' of course, those are present in just about any population. Though we may see them as more common than they actually are, they don't represent us.