Originally Posted by Tasix
No it wouldn't.
By voting on a persons entire case, whether all games shown are bad or there is a mix of good and bad it shows a persons whole persona on average.
Players seen to be bad in all games are more likely to get punished for consistency, however it only HAS to take 1 case of violation of the SC to be punished, so be it by game or by case makes no difference you would still reach the same conclusion
sigh, this is the third time i repeated this point -
the problem is, the voters only read the first two or three games to reach a conclusion. This works only if the person is guilty in those games, unlike the case i have shown where the person is guilty is the 4th and 5th games, but he is pardoned probably because the majority did not read them.
3 false reports and 2 legit reports means the person SHOULD be punished. The fault has been specified, i hope you understand my perspective