Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
...okay? What's this mean?
|
It means simply this; if I make rush in and end up dying and they say "Hey x, why did you rush y?" then I'll explain the action or even admit to making an error. Contrary to what some people out there think, there is nothing wrong with simply admitting you made a mistake. However, if they say "Hey x, you suck newb!" or "lol, x is ******" or even "why the **** did you dive you moron!" then I won't even justify that with a response and will simply note that player to be reported after the game.
So if they're civil I'll discuss the action or the motive or what happened, even except constructive criticism of how I'm playing or mistakes I might be making. Sometimes it takes an outsiders eyes to find your faults after all. However, if they're being a dick then I'll shrug it off, keep playing and simply let the system handle them by reporting when the game is done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
You are being very passive-aggressive. Example: "You think Dota 2 will be better then good luck to you, because in my experience (and those of most I know who've gone that way) has been quite the opposite, but the grass is always greener right?"
|
It's not passive aggressive; just honest. If you think it will be better then by all means play it, I see no reason for you to come here and ridicule this game, its players and the system if you've already made the decision that Dota 2 is better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
I do not say something else is happening. I was pointing out a flaw in your logic. You say, "If A, than B". I say, "A is mutually exclusive with C, B cannot be true without A and C is true, therefore B is false.
|
You pointed out the flaw by using the same flaw to support your own statement. It's not a flaw in my logic, but merely my viewpoint based on my own perception. Doesn't make it fact, it's just how I see it working out to this point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
You cannot use anecdotal evidence to prove a logical point.
|
Neither can you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
Yes, I am attacking you. Your whole premise is that "It's human nature, so why bother?" This is wrong.
|
And your attacks merely make my case since you are exhibiting that very nature. I'm not saying "don't bother", what I'm saying is that your demands and expectations for Riot to fix what is basically a societal problem are unrealistic at best, potentially problematic at worst since and overbearing system can do more harm than good and such a system would be required to actually rid the game of toxic players.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
Bam, right here.
|
Right here what? You can't change the world man, and we're talking some deep rooted societal issues that exist not just in LoL, but everywhere, be it a game or YouTube or some other random site. You can demand Riot "fix it" until you're blue in the face, but that doesn't change the grand scope of the problem, or even present any actual solution to the problem. Like I've said already, this is a balancing act that can't just be "fixed" with the snap of a finger. They have to balance this issue and make sure that they implement a system that not only deals with toxic players but doesn't hinder or damage the player experience for the playerbase as a whole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
Grammar is important.
|
Sure is, but I see nothing to demonstrate that you are in any way an expert on the matter that would incline me to accept your little jab as anything other than your attempt to belittle your opposition. To be honest, your grammar hasn't been perfection either, but that is of no consequence to me or this discussion since I have still be perfectly capable of understanding your statements and position.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fistful of Force
True. However, to quoque. Which is to say, you too.
|
Oh yeah, I've just been firing off those attacks left and right.