Cept it is more like the Jury says 10 years, then the Judge decides on the death penalty after coming out of the bathroom with a joint hanging out of his mouth. The context of how that decision was arrived at is my concern.

I am just worried that, at best, this is a Tribunal bug or, at worst, human error in issuing the Perma. This guy is a jerk - no argument here - but he should have been shown the door through the rules Riot themselves have designed. There are a lot of ambigious issues surrounding this case that I would like to be cleared up, else they become a headache for us later when we bring up the competency of the whole, "but every perma bamp is overseen by a Rioter" thing.

While it might be a bug and you should send in a report ticket it's also inescapable that your currently toxic and haven't changed your ways despite all the warning and temp bans you got and perhaps Riot got some reports sent straight to them that caused them to look over your case file and decide to make it perma ban worthy.

Blaming it on others doesn't work since the 2 wrongs don't make a right is pretty apt here, if your going to agree to the rules you can't decide to break them just because someone else does. It's like saying to the officer who writes you a speeding ticket well officer I was breaking the law because I saw him and him do it as well.

You've only yourself to blame for either responding to the trolls or becoming the same thing you complain about and we all get trolls in games yet most of us don't end up here constantly either.

Once again, not arguing the fact that he clearly deserves to be where he is: my concern is how he arrived here.

As far as I'm concerned, there are no problems in the presentation of his 2 week bamp cases: He hangs himself clearly.

It is the in the perma that, as he is serving the 2 week bamp, that he is put forewords through the Tribunal again where data is being reused against him. As I've said, I normally do not go out on a limb here but I have never heard of a situation in which a person goes from 2 week to perma bamp BASED on recycled cases being used against him. This occuring while there is a Tribunal update, which various people have attested to with a delay in case results being pushed through.

I understand the right for a Rioter's perma bamping privilages, but I still am voicing a concern that, in this case, there needs to be some clarity as to the process of how this one case ended up as a Perma while a person is still serving his time.

I reiterate: OP is toxic, he is scum, he is not someone I'd lose sleep over BUT there are some facts, or lack therefore of, that could lead to a potentially unwelcomed precedent. It is a cold day in hell that I go out voicing some doubt over the Tribunal system, but how the process of this particular case *seems* to have occured leaves me quite chilled.

I was correctly perma banned. I bet yall are happy, yes rejoice in the retribution, it feels so good. You are the foot and the face, and the foot is smashing the face. Props if you get the reference.

Same as me. 2week banned turned to a perma ban lol