I think the Adult-only idea wouldnt help. I know plenty of minors who are very civil and can play this game without problems. And then I know adults who are known to be huge ragers and trolls.

I agree on the point that champ select chat should be seen in tribunal, or at least there should be some type of report option during that time, which sends the log to tribunal with said report.

I also agree on the point that being able to use different champs in different ways, or having the option of not following to the meta is a great thing to have and going into queue by position would hurt this.

Breaking the meta is something I have 0, problem with. In fact I would encourage it. The point was they take a character and run items that completely don't scale. Adults only, I didn't give an age, it's a frame of mind. These kids who wanna "LOL" after every gank or kill, no matter how low they got or how close it was or behavior of the like should have a separate queue.

The preferred positions idea is interesting, but that bases the entire game off of the current meta. Thus, not good.

I think the solution is to be able kick players in the champ select screen, 4 people vote to kick and your gone, champ selects start all over again with the same people as before and a new player joins.

My other solution is that there needs to be a message somewhere once you have entered the champ select screen to clearly state that its Pick Order>Calls because I'm so sick of people thinking that whoever calls first gets that position, it needs to be clearly stated somewhere for everyone to see cause no one reads that summoners code(I have).

My last solution is for normal blind pick games (not ranked or draft) there should be a system where you are locked and cannot choose your champ for about 15-20 seconds upon entering the lobby, what this will do is stop people from instant locking when you enter the lobby.

The whole AGE part of a game makes it pointless. There's plenty of 13 year olds that I'd rather be around than people my own age or older.

I know plenty of 40+s that are worse than the 17-25 age group. I know people of all ages dumber than my 5 year old.

Anything with age is fail when it comes to something like this so why even try to argue the point? Well not even making any VALID arguments. You're behind a screen, I can lie about my age and no one would know so there's even a bigger fail for ya.

Then do what IMVU does. They have a thing with "Age validation." You punch in your SS or fax them your drivers license blahblahblah and they give you a thing on your profile that says "Age Checked." That's going to be hard for Riot, but I'm sure they could work something out.