I would like something to rely on as a last resort when 2 or more players fail to reach compromise. I feel like this could reduce a lot of rage, trolling, and general pregame team self-destruction. Just a simple 2-12 randomize function. This along with a pregame chat log for tribunal could probably come close to eliminating pregame misbehavior.

In case this wasn't clear
/roll Randomizes of # 2-12 is like a player rolling 2 dice.
Both Conflicting players /roll and they get a random number between 2-12, the winner is determined by highest roller.

Please Bump for Justice and Demacia!
TLDR; This is a short post, if you didn't read, don't post.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldilocksSludge I like the idea. It gives a fair, totally unbiased way to resolve an argument. It's theoretically real nice. Practically, though, what do you honestly expect? I see it going more like this... A: I don't support, I'm jungling. B: No way, man, I'm jungling. A: BUT I CAN'T SUPPORT ****** TROLL GG B: Tough, I'm jungling anyway *** loser **** **** **** troll C: guys, just roll for it. A + B: OK! They roll. The outcome is irrelevant. Roll winner: Yeah, so you support. Roll loser: no way ******, I don't support /locks in jungle. Roll winner: **** YOU GG TROLL REPORTED /locks in jungle I do like the idea of submitting pregame chat logs to the tribunal. That needs to happen. I don't think it would stop people from ignoring the results of their roll, because, let's face it, the people that would need to use the function are the people that won't care about the rules and screw with you anyway.

I like the idea. It gives a fair, totally unbiased way to resolve an argument. It's theoretically real nice.

Practically, though, what do you honestly expect? I see it going more like this...

A: I don't support, I'm jungling.
B: No way, man, I'm jungling.
A: BUT I CAN'T SUPPORT ****** TROLL GG
B: Tough, I'm jungling anyway *** loser **** **** **** troll
C: guys, just roll for it.
A + B: OK!

They roll. The outcome is irrelevant.

Roll winner: Yeah, so you support.
Roll loser: no way ******, I don't support /locks in jungle.
Roll winner: **** YOU GG TROLL REPORTED /locks in jungle

I do like the idea of submitting pregame chat logs to the tribunal. That needs to happen. I don't think it would stop people from ignoring the results of their roll, because, let's face it, the people that would need to use the function are the people that won't care about the rules and screw with you anyway.

I think this will work.

It won't solve all of the issues in chat, but as long as both of the arguing players aren't total dicks they can probably make a happier compromise.

Plus, as bait to Riot, this could give them an out to the whole pick vs call order senario. They could just say "Use the /roll function if you're having an issue, and report the player who doesn't honor the roll results."

I would prefer a random number from [0, 1) over [2,12] (and DEFINITELY do not do sum-dice rolls, since that follows a binomial model)

It would change nothing. At all.

Unless you're suggesting that pregame chats be added to Tribunal logs, as well, because that's a thing that should've happened a LONG time ago.

bump