Originally Posted by Shiister
You are speculating also. You assuming he is a bad player and not intentionally feeding.
Everyone interpret this case differently, just how Tribunal works.
Yeah, but he's speculating responsibly given what's on the line and the effects the Tribunal decisions have on other players. There's a reason the legal system requires evidence prove a matter beyond a reasonable doubt, because it's irresponsible to punish someone based on a whim. There are plenty of ways those games could have resulted from a bad game, bad connection, or many other reasons. Plus, there being only 2 games to the case isn't even enough to show it's even a trend for the user and there being only 2 games in the case is suspect in itself.
Frankly, this is just another piece of ammo for the Tribunal haters to demonstrate the flaws of the system, and some of the people here are doing a really bad job of proving this system is just in any way, shape or form. It's a shame that a system such as this that could be something positive is constantly showing how incredibly flawed it really is, and the attitudes of some here only drive that home further.