I can honestly say I have no idea who to side with. I would usually say the admins have better judgement but from the 'ur still banned kid' it seems like it could go either way.
-after reading psyconics side-
Sounds like a definite abuse of power, even reading from both sides it seems like he just didn't want to play alongside psyconic. Nothing he did warranted even a 1 minute ban. There was no intentional disruption of gameplay, he played the whole way through, he just didn't want to participate in one team fight because of a personal quarrel, everyone does that. You can't ban someone for being bad.
Personally, his whole ban should be lifted, because the fact that there is a ban AT ALL is worrisome to the community. Should we really be afraid to play among each other? Are some people above the law? When does the line for professionalism stop? By changing the ban from 30 days to 2 days he admitted that it was off on-spot bias that he extended an unusual punishment. What if this thread never was made? Abuse of power would still continue.
Originally Posted by Magus of Java
This is blatant abuse of power. Regardless of "why". He even admits it, by reducing it from 30 to 2 days. Someone that makes a decision based off of hurt feelings and personal bias shouldn't even have that power......imo