Quote:
Originally Posted by TheWedge
Surrender does need to get tweeked but it needs to get changed in the other direction. I'm tired of people surrendering before an inhibitor is even down. It's today's "I want it now society" You can't improve if your only willing to play games your going to win. Eventually you'll just end up quitting everything. People surrendering because they lost a few fights and not a single inner turret is down is just bs and it has implications on a morals level on top of it. There are plenty of champs that don't even get started till late game. I've won games where we had all 3 of our inhibitors down and they didn't even have turrets down. Bunch of dang babies learn to put some effort into something.
|
The competitor to this game has a start over button for the early matches that mess up, both teams vote. I've restarted many games where generous people would allow the restart.
Surrendering in a game is about enjoyment, do you enjoy this game?
Do you enjoy losing?
How long are you willing to wait to get into a game you enjoy (see: Win) while in a game you don't?
You critique society and quiting but Bill Gates quit Harvard....
A lot of notable people quit things for any given reason.
Take a Anthropology, Psychology, Sociology class at the local community college and you'll understand a little more about the man-apes that rage at the computer.
We've always been this way, since before Greek - o - Roman periods.
I'm patient when I am hunting, I'll wait for my game, but if I'm not in an area where prey has ever been present its doing me more harm than good.
Clearly I made this way to long.
Summary:
He was wrong, about quitting but right about the morality of it. Move on.
??
Recruiter
