Me and 4 other RL friends are going to be running a pre-made to test this Tribunal thing out. After every game we are going to report the same 2 people designated at the start of the experiment for verbal abuse and intentional feeding (2 most common reports?). At the end of this experiment we believe at least one of these individuals will receive either a warning or a short ban.
To add a control measure into this, neither of the aforementioned players will be playing ANY other games outside of our pre-made experiment. The players being reported will NOT be taking any action which could ever be construed as or related to their individual report to avoid any misconceptions as to their actions. Also, I feel it is important to add that we will not be goading the opposing team to make any reports against the individuals either.
We intend to play somewhere in the vicinity of 20 - 25 games before resuming normal play, I am unsure as to whether that will be a sufficient amount of reports but as we would be averaging between 80-100 I would hope that it will be.
EDIT: After a total of 23 games played and 92 reports on both individuals the cases seemed to have found their way to the tribunal, and the results of which were a bit surprising to me, but not necessarily unexpected.
Individual A was reported 92 times over the course of 23 games for Verbal Abuse, the result of this was surprisingly only a warning a email, no punishment delivered. I had hypothesized that this would be the report which received the harshest punishment as it is seemingly the easiest to violate.
Individual B was reported 92 times over the course of 23 games for Intentional Feeding, the result of this is unknown, original
Results invalid, participant B lied about the result