Originally Posted by bARRtender
There's one of them. I was about to post in it.
I really hope some red is actually looking at these. This issue would completely throw out the idea that warnings/bans are to make people reform.
That topic fully states that he has been playing. You have to take his word that he didn't say anything to deserve the ban.
The original post concerned being banned when not playing any games at all, making it an impossibility that this person did something. Maybe the poster in that topic was reported for refusing to communicate with his team.
Edit: You must fully understand that time and time again, those banned by tribunal have lied between their teeth in what I can only assume is an attempt to get unbanned without a rioter stopping to check their record. It's been shown multiple times and I see no reason to assume these cases are any different.