Kohana, you got some cheese cake?

Actually, I do have a fetish for gay porn. :">

In my country, homosexuals can not get married or congregate in any public area, especially with children around.
That is how it should be.

Homosexuals being around children/raising children is pure unadulterated insanity... unless it's their own child, in which case the child is boned anyway.

Marriage equality is left to fight for.

When I could drive to Vegas any day of the week and marry some random bum I meet on the street provided they are male, but my 53 year old uncle can't marry the man he has been with for 20 plus years, that's a right worth fighting for.

These people that say it 'degrades the sanctity of marriage,' you ever notice it's usually coming from a zealot like Limbaugh who has been divorced several times? What's that doing for the sanctity of marriage?

If two gay people want to legally bind themselves to each other in the eyes of the government I'm all for it. So long as they don't get the same tax advantages that heterosexual couples get, because I'll be ****ed if I'm paying just so some girly man can be happy.

right, because the stereotype of gay men being feminine is not a modern phenomenon no. It was like that just started in the 20th century.
in history gay men have always acted that way.
look at alexander the great, total fashion w h o r e.
These guys totally care about their graceful ways http://hudsonknowsbest.files.wordpre...05/obvor1.jpeg


anyway, kohana bring some of that cake here. this discussion can use it

That was just meant to upset the sensitive gays that would prove my stereotype correct. Thanks for not trying to rebut my actual argument though, just like a true liberal.

first of all i am not liberal, I am actually politically very conservative.
second of all you didn't have an argument
just a desire

for the record i am not offended, I just thought you could use some more information (cause you looked highly uneducated)

You are wrong on multiple accounts. My argument was more implicit since i did not outright state it. But it's not hard to see that I am arguing that any form of gay marriage should not be treated the same as heterosexual marriage because of tax benefits. Reason being that these tax benefits are in place to promote procreation for stable population growth. How exactly do gays promote population growth?

As for uneducated, you might want to take a look at your own misspelled and poorly formatted posts before you judge someone there.

that is an argument, good job.
simply stating a whim is not "implicitly stating and argument."

also it is the ****ing internet nobody speaks with correct grammar except pretentious people who don't know how to troll well.

believe what you will anyway,. I am uninterested in arguing with you. you're the type to come stubbornly into a conversation and merely belittle others opinions, rather than actually have a discussion.