Hello,
I've just found out a case where a guy got pardoned by the majority even though he was quite negative in my opinion. I'm asking the community why they think this guy deserved to be pardoned. Here is the case :

http://na.leagueoflegends.com/tribun.../5572324/#nogo


Here is my opinion :
- Incident 1 : he had a general bad attitude, quite spammy and often speaking in caps. It's not that bad though.
- Incident 2 : insulted as soon as the game began "piece of s hit, f aggot". "s hit heads" later. General negativity.
- Incident 3 : very negative about yorick first "you s uck, "f ucking useless", "r etard". then became negative toward MF too after she told him to "chill out" : "b itch", "you're a fail", "a sshole", "you s uck a ss" "f ucking r etard".
- Incident 4 : "shu t up n0ob kayle", "f ucktard", "f uck you f aggot".

In conclusion I think this guy is in each incidents very negative toward his mates and often insults them.

Once again please let me know what do you think about that ! Thanks.

If people pardon this, I'll never get banned

It could have been a bugged case where the Tribunal very simply presented with an empty chat, they used to have some issues with that.

Most people would assume the "verbal abuse" report was wrong when clearly no one had said a word whole game, and as such they pressed Pardon.

Tribunal cannot punish everyone 100%. Sorry you missed out on 5 IP or something.

I would have hit punish, he verbaly abused his team on each "incident". How this guy got through tribunal is anyones guess.

Imagine if there was a word filter that just took any game where someone cursed 5+ times and auto banned them. Would that make the game better? I don't think so.
Opinions side, all of these games had reports from only a single player. I always feel those have less weight and skip those. idk.