But that's just it, you may have people at 50 wins, just hitting level 30 that can quickly move up to the 1800 ELO, or you can have people 400 wins and can barely go 50/50 at the 1200 ELO and still others that are at 700+ wins that can't win at all in ranked. I've read a few threads with just that, people who have hundreds of more wins than I do that can't win in ranked.
That's why I'm saying a win total, game total is arbitrary. It only means more experience, not higher skill level. Someone playing more than another person isn't a good enough measure of skill level.
I'm not a pro, I struggle in ranked too, but I win more than lose in draft. So I think it's time to play a few ranked games, see my areas of weakness then pop back out to draft to practice on those weaknesses. I don't troll, I don't role a bad champ, I try my hardest to win and play with the team. So why should I have to wait for some number of wins? I've already had to race to level 30 and save enough IP to get 16 champs. Number of games won't make me better, playing against tougher opponents will. Practice will.
So I back the idea to implement changes to report pregame trolling, and perhaps role selecting up front. I don't support the idea that if you just play normals long enough you're good enough to play ranked. Normals doesn't even use a jungle or ADC/Support Bot in over half the games I play. That only increases bad habits just like bot games.
??
Senior Member
