ok ty

Question for Lomar:

Lochner -- justifiably part of the "anti-canon" or a reasonable doctrine improperly distinguished from the rest of the Fourteenth Amendment protections?

It's a burning question.

... also what are you talking about when you say "pixel tracking"? When are you tracking "where we come from"?


And third: tell me more about this arbitration clause and what you think its legal effect is.

• Who is the arbitrator? ( http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/9/5 )
• What guarantees are you providing that the arbitrator would not be someone who relies on Riot for their paycheck and will always find for Riot?
• Are you attempting to force all parties to be present in LA or hire counsel in LA? ( http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/9/7 )

Cool! Thanks for letting us know, and making it in a legible way

Disappointed in the individual arbitration clause. I realise that it is all the rage these days and don't foresee any need for a class action case against Riot, but I dislike how companies are systematically dismantling legal protections that are vital to the proper operation of the judicial system by using EULA's. You guys are better than that and ought to act as good corporate citizens and set an example for others rather than sinking to their level.

Tl;dr


riot is instating martial law

I am the law!!!