some guys find girls that look like strippers attractive.
some girls find guys that look like spartan men attractive.
saying one is sexualized and the other is not is flat out contradictory.
its completely perspective based what makes your opinion or mine for that matter right for what is sexualized and what is not.
how about we let the artist create their work and we thank them for the free product we supply us.?
This is not to say that Spartan warriors CANNOT be sexualized. If you want an example of that, look at Ruthless Pantheon in contrast to the default skin. It's entirely obvious what the difference is.
I'm not a fan of stripperriffic skins, but I can put up with the occasional obvious fanservice skin, and I'm willing to classify Ruthless Panth alongside Kitty Cat Kat and Battle Bunny Riven. It's the obvious difference in how sexualized the supposedly serious skins for female champions are that annoys me.