Well I can agree with a few of the posts on here. If the they where found to be cheating, definitely let them play it out would be better than a DQ and funner for everyone. As for the technical issues yeah it sucks that it had to happen like that but, **** Happens if anyone is actually upset over this more than just the let down of how good of a game the CLG.eu game was and what point it was at when it dropped off, (which at most is a minor inconvenience) they will get over it.

I find it kinda funny that people only put their own opinion into consideration. Although that is mainly society anyways, which is a large reason why society is so uneffetive. As a large company like Riot is, from the given evidence the most effective course of action would be to created a rematch between TSM vs Azubu. Now many people will not believe TSM deserves another chance, that they lost and cheating was only on one game, or they hate TSM or love Azubu. However, as a company you must consider everything. First off they have to consider precident from this tournament and previous they have run, and the precident is a full rematch. Second, TSM is a company and although many people hate big businesses (which although you may consider yourself democratic, the idea of large corporations is capitolism which means you really shouldn't live in america if you believe this due to the fact that our society will never change from this course), the best course of action for Riot as a business is a rematch because it increases profit margains with potentially 3 additional matches. Third, the mission of this tournament is to find the best team in the world, and although cheating on 1 game may seem unsubstatial, in all actuality it creates a scewed result and therefore does not follow the integrity of the system and its ideals if left alone. The fourth and final reason is ethics. I know many people have not taken ethics as a class but those of you who have like myself will understand where I am coming from. I went to a military school where ethics are considered very important and therefore I have studied ethics much more than the average person on these boards, however ethically you must decide what is the best decision based on the facts, reguardless if it is the most popular and ethically the actions taken by Azubu should consequate a rematch because ethically that is the lesser evil. Ethics isn't always what might sound the coolest but the evils of preventing TSM a fair matchup vs Azubu being forced to win again would go toward TSM ethically and this may be hard to understand but the correct decision would be to allow TSM a rematch for these four reasons. Yes there are a few reasons against it and some group of people will be upset reguardless of the decision but as a company trying to illustate their belief in fairness and excellence to the world, the correct decision is to allow a rematch to TSM.