Originally Posted by Morello
I know this isn't my area of expertise, but if you found your purchase worth it and enjoy the skin, is it ripping someone off? I'm not sure I get that.
It is semantics, but you are right, if at the end of use of the lulu skin he/she feels she has gotten more enjoyment that he/she did for a 975 skin of the same caliber(let us say arcade sona, dinosaur cho, bunny teemo) then no it is not a rip off.
But if she/he didn't then yes, he she payed more than they should have to get an inferior product for more, simply because of an impulse buy.
I for one, think that skin would probably be worth as much as its priced, but changing your pricing system leaves everyone poorer, and im not about to pay another 5 bucks to get that skin when i purposly saved 990 for the next awesome skin to come along
Also, i don't understand why you would even raise the price...
I took high school economics and there were those graughs, and at lower prices MORE PEOPLE bought more of the product, generating more profit(sometimes) than higher prices (because less people bought the higher prices stuff) and with digital goods that do not have a production/distribution cost after it is made( meaning you can sell 1 million and it'll cost you the same as selling 1) I don't see why you wouldn't aim more towards an even LOWER price. 975 seems likea good number where it is at. infact probably a perfect number. and legendary skins should probably be around 12 bucks.(1600) not 15~1860