Since when is swearing bannable, or raging outloud and not in chat?

If the other players aren't affected by it...it's really no harm no foul.

Even if they were swearing in chat, swearing isn't inherently negative.

Riot won't consistently ban prop players, because if they did then people who enjoy watching their favorite players would stop watching. That and teams would be in disarray if they had their players being permanently banned. Which in turn affects the whole competitive scene. I doubt we will see any more bans on pro players, the chances are slim.

Oh Snap, props to riot for pulling no punches no matter who you are.

I don't mean to derail the thread, as I know it's about pro player bans and not the tribunal in general - but you just contradicted yourself in the same paragraph.

First you say players should punish if they see even one case of toxicity because of the player needing dozens or hundreds of reports to get in to the Tribunal. These are cases we, the people judging the case, can't see and therefore should not be relevant to the case..

Then you go on to say that the system is designed to be, "Extremely conservative".
How is judging cases on evidence we can't see in any way being, "Extremely conservative?"

Isnt that exactly what Riot is doing? Your argument is invalid.

You show that you have the reasoning and logic skills of a baby carrot.

Wtf does physical assault on a non-sports job have to do with TRASH TALKING IN SPORTS?

You blithering idiot.

Nice comparing apples to giraffes.

That's mostly because IWD has a worse track record than every north american pro put together. It's really that bad.

You're the one who said "Ignore things you don't like in the real world and deal with it." I gave you a real world situation. Nice job posting a failed strawman argument.