Originally Posted by Cards and Dice
Ah, that's right. The old passive. The one that made Atma's broken... huehuehue. I remember now.
Anyways, Jax is still a nightmare when "squishy"(meaning no HP items built, except for Triforce). A Warmog's could be nice, but I still win 1v1s vs tanks due to the new sustain items. S3 may have been a bit ****, but Jax benefitted quite nicely. He is a counter to the tanky meta with BotRK in hand, too much sustain to die, even without tankiness. Who knew.
As for your last paragraph(s)
... I really, really cannot tell if trolling or retarded.
1v1=/=duelist. I repeat: 1V1 =/= DUELIST.
Dueling means going on a straight-out brawl and smacking each other with all possible sources of damage available to each other in a full-frontal attack. Running around trolling the enemy does not count as a duel.
Singed is not a duelist.
Malphite is NOT a duelist.
Kennen... used to be a bottom ADC, but now, a hit-and-run mage. Not a duelist anymore.
AND LEBLANC, IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD, IS NOT A DUELIST, SHE IS A FCKING ASSASSIN THAT CANNOT TAKE ON MALZAHAR.
dude you just made yourself into a hypocrite,
i said if anyone can beat someone 1vs1, thats a "duelist" in your opinion,
are all strong matchups vs jax and should win vs him if they are equal skill level,
using your skills to your advantage is just that.
a ryze can easily go shot for shot vs a jax and win, your counter strike does nothing and ryze puts out more dps than you do, a jax needs to build momentum, Ryze does not.
Can ryze prison jax and stand face to face and let him hit him? sure, by would would you? you'd cast and kite, if jax leaps on, you'd prison move away and cast, while still weaving in auto attacks.
if you say ryze shouldnt be allowed to prison and regain distance, then thats like saying when Jax uses his stun, he isnt allowed to hit them, or if he does stun them, he has to move away.
and now to show that you're a hypocrite, you blah blah blah about how Jax can beat anyone..funny how you said ''anyone'' but restrict it to only people you find to be appropriate "duelists"..BUT then you go ahead and say "but I still win 1v1s vs tanks due to the new sustain items"
you win a 1vs1 vs tanks...tanks arent duelists according to you, so why the hypocrisy now? just to validate your biased point? that comment has nothing to do in here since, tanks arent duelist, its moot that you can kill them.
but people who can kill you, you say arent duelist, i love that flawed logic.
by your logic, since jax always wins,
anything that Jax CAN and DOES kill all those defeated people are duelists.
anyone that jax cannot kill or get killed by, is not a duelist.
love that flawed logic
also did i say singed will run 35miles while jax chases him to eventually die to poison? no
they both got sustain dmg, both innate tankyness, one gets AS+tanky stats with an ult, the other gets tenacity and tanky stats and move speed.
you got a stun, he has a fling, you cant do anything while stunned, you cant do anything while flinged, a singed can stand toe to toe with you, flinging you, weaving poison through you, with his ult on and do fair trades, you'd fall he would win all early and mid game, you'd have no late game.
and the fact you said leblanc cant kill a malzahar you're a joke, you think a mage just having a supress for an ult emans they auto win?
a QSS says hi , it makes malz a joke, thats why he ahs little ranked play.
Leblanc out ranges your Q silence and could out juke your Q silence and 3shot you before you could even ult, you;d be silenced.
and he was talking about malz being a burst mage, damage over time spells isnt burst, i think you two are the ******* tbh