If it did then it would actually be a decent item on him, considering it would be a total of +90 damage for each attack after 8 attacks.

However, it does not, as only the first hit of tiger applies on hit effects.

I believe however, and correct me if I am wrong, that every tick of phoenix will proc malady, as well as every 3rd attack, as those are instances of damage from a champion which do not have the tiger restriction on them.

So for a fully maladied champion that would be 6 ticks of phoenix (?), 3 attacks, and 1 phoenix proc, for a total of 10 procs from 3 attacks, or 300 damage. If you have malady fully applied. If it works that way. If you get 3 attacks off. If phoenix ticks 6 times.


Still, lotta potential for damage at least.

I know only the first hit of tiger applies on hit, but the 5 additional damage per hit isnt an on hit effect, only applying it is. Since Malady's effect does an additional 5 damage each time they are attacked by an enemy, each of tigers three attacks should be affected by it. Unless you already know this isnt the case for sure.

The cost of Malady is a bit too much for what it does. Id rather get a starks or a last whisper. Even a Wit's End has that Good passive.

In most of the cases it is a bad item, yes, but there are exceptions.

Malady's passive is actually good when you have a lot of damage ticking as in Udyr's case.

Every time somebody buys Malady.
God kills a kitten.
That is why I stack maladys on Twitch, he hates cats. ^^

Wrong. Prove plz.

Don't forget the other most useful item after/before Malady, the allmighty Tiamat!

I'm nearly certain, because even though the effect is applied to the target, it is still an on hit effect.